Free audit data · Liverpool

Website for landscapers in Liverpool

We audited the top landscapers websites in Liverpool and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for landscapers in Liverpool, from £395, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real landscapers websites in Liverpool. Average score: 77/100. Published 2026-08-16.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top landscapers websites in Liverpool. Across 5 sites the average score was 77 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • rooplex.co.uk — 65/100 (C). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; 2 of 2 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • gardenuk.co.uk — 92/100 (A). No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • mosslandscapes.co.uk — 69/100 (C). No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • easyhomeimprovement.co.uk — 88/100 (B). No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
  • liverpool-landscaping.co.uk — 73/100 (C). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.

The pattern in Liverpool is consistent: most landscapers sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. — found on 2 of the sites we audited

A full website build for landscapers in Liverpool is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 landscapers sites we audited in Liverpool

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 rooplex.co.uk 65/100 C No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · 2 of 2 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
2 gardenuk.co.uk 92/100 A No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
3 mosslandscapes.co.uk 69/100 C No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
4 easyhomeimprovement.co.uk 88/100 B No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
5 liverpool-landscaping.co.uk 73/100 C Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.