Free audit data · Derby

Website for landscapers in Derby

We audited the top landscapers websites in Derby and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for landscapers in Derby, from £395, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real landscapers websites in Derby. Average score: 72/100. Published 2026-08-16.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top landscapers websites in Derby. Across 5 sites the average score was 72 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • robinsnestderby.co.uk — 58/100 (C). 6 of 7 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.; 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • gwlandscapesltd.co.uk — 73/100 (C). 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • pavemaster.co.uk — 77/100 (B). 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
  • rocklandscapegardening.co.uk — 73/100 (C). Built on Squarespace — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • landscapederbyshire.co.uk — 77/100 (B). 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.

The pattern in Derby is consistent: most landscapers sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • 6 of 7 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for landscapers in Derby is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 landscapers sites we audited in Derby

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 robinsnestderby.co.uk 58/100 C 6 of 7 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess. · 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.
2 gwlandscapesltd.co.uk 73/100 C 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
3 pavemaster.co.uk 77/100 B 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
4 rocklandscapegardening.co.uk 73/100 C Built on Squarespace — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
5 landscapederbyshire.co.uk 77/100 B 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.