Free audit data · Bournemouth

Website for landscapers in Bournemouth

We audited the top landscapers websites in Bournemouth and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for landscapers in Bournemouth, from £395, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real landscapers websites in Bournemouth. Average score: 70/100. Published 2026-08-18.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top landscapers websites in Bournemouth. Across 5 sites the average score was 70 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • nexgenlandscapes.co.uk — 88/100 (B). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • landscapersbournemouth.co.uk — 46/100 (D). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
  • datagemba.com — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • bournemouthlandscapers.co.uk — 73/100 (C). 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • topratedlandscapers.co.uk — 92/100 (A). No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.

The pattern in Bournemouth is consistent: most landscapers sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. — found on 2 of the sites we audited

A full website build for landscapers in Bournemouth is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 landscapers sites we audited in Bournemouth

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 nexgenlandscapes.co.uk 88/100 B Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
2 landscapersbournemouth.co.uk 46/100 D No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.
3 datagemba.com 50/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.
4 bournemouthlandscapers.co.uk 73/100 C 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
5 topratedlandscapers.co.uk 92/100 A No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.