Free audit data · Hamilton

Website for landscapers in Hamilton

We audited the top landscapers websites in Hamilton and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for landscapers in Hamilton, from NZD 819, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real landscapers websites in Hamilton. Average score: 69/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top landscapers websites in Hamilton. Across 5 sites the average score was 69 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • groundcoverlandscaping.co.nz — 84/100 (B). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • armstronglandscape.co.nz — 77/100 (B). 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • 10best.co.nz — 77/100 (B). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • landworxhamilton.co.nz — 50/100 (D). The site is not served over HTTPS — visitors see an insecure warning.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • jglandcareservices.co.nz — 58/100 (C). 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.

The pattern in Hamilton is consistent: most landscapers sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for landscapers in Hamilton is a fixed NZD 819, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 landscapers sites we audited in Hamilton

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 groundcoverlandscaping.co.nz 84/100 B No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
2 armstronglandscape.co.nz 77/100 B 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
3 10best.co.nz 77/100 B Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
4 landworxhamilton.co.nz 50/100 D The site is not served over HTTPS — visitors see an insecure warning. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
5 jglandcareservices.co.nz 58/100 C 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.