Free audit data · Toronto

Website for landscapers in Toronto

We audited the top landscapers websites in Toronto and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for landscapers in Toronto, from CAD 675, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real landscapers websites in Toronto. Average score: 66/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top landscapers websites in Toronto. Across 5 sites the average score was 66 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • torontoblogs.ca — 84/100 (B). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • thebesttoronto.com — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • groundsguys.ca — 96/100 (A). 3 of 106 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.
  • homestars.com — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • toronto.cdncompanies.com — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.

The pattern in Toronto is consistent: most landscapers sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for landscapers in Toronto is a fixed CAD 675, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 landscapers sites we audited in Toronto

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 torontoblogs.ca 84/100 B Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
2 thebesttoronto.com 50/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.
3 groundsguys.ca 96/100 A 3 of 106 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.
4 homestars.com 50/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.
5 toronto.cdncompanies.com 50/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.