Free audit data · Brighton
Website for builders in Brighton
We audited the top builders websites in Brighton and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for builders in Brighton, from £395, delivered in days.
We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top builders websites in Brighton. Across 5 sites the average score was 65 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.
- mcobuildingcontractors.co.uk — 69/100 (C). No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; Built on Wix — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
- datagemba.com — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
- five-stars.com — 88/100 (B). No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
- blountconstruction.co.uk — 62/100 (C). 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
- mastersgroup.uk — 57/100 (C). The page has no
tag — search engines cannot tell what it is about.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
The pattern in Brighton is consistent: most builders sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.
What it costs to fix
- No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 4 of the sites we audited
- No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
- No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
- No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
- Built on Wix — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 1 of the sites we audited
A full website build for builders in Brighton is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.
Check your own site
This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.
The 5 builders sites we audited in Brighton
| Site | Score | Top issues found | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | mcobuildingcontractors.co.uk | 69/100 C | No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · Built on Wix — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. |
| 2 | datagemba.com | 50/100 D | The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. |
| 3 | five-stars.com | 88/100 B | No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. |
| 4 | blountconstruction.co.uk | 62/100 C | 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. |
| 5 | mastersgroup.uk | 57/100 C | The page has no |
Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.