Free audit data · Oxford

Website for builders in Oxford

We audited the top builders websites in Oxford and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for builders in Oxford, from £395, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real builders websites in Oxford. Average score: 64/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top builders websites in Oxford. Across 5 sites the average score was 64 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • datagemba.com — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • oxfordbuildersltd.co.uk — 57/100 (C). The page took 4114ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • crawfordconstruction.co.uk — 100/100 (A). No major problems found
  • findglocal.com — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • kmbuildersoxford.co.uk — 62/100 (C). 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.

The pattern in Oxford is consistent: most builders sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 4 of the sites we audited
  • The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 2 of the sites we audited

A full website build for builders in Oxford is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 builders sites we audited in Oxford

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 datagemba.com 50/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.
2 oxfordbuildersltd.co.uk 57/100 C The page took 4114ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
3 crawfordconstruction.co.uk 100/100 A No major problems found
4 findglocal.com 50/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.
5 kmbuildersoxford.co.uk 62/100 C 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.