Free audit data · London

Website for builders in London

We audited the top builders websites in London and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for builders in London, from £395, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real builders websites in London. Average score: 74/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top builders websites in London. Across 5 sites the average score was 74 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • buildingconstructor.co.uk — 88/100 (B). 2 of 35 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
  • elitebuilderslondon.co.uk — 73/100 (C). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • buildingconstructor.com — 50/100 (D). No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • redlinebuilding.co.uk — 77/100 (B). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • akb-builders.co.uk — 84/100 (B). No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.

The pattern in London is consistent: most builders sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • 2 of 35 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for builders in London is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 builders sites we audited in London

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 buildingconstructor.co.uk 88/100 B 2 of 35 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
2 elitebuilderslondon.co.uk 73/100 C Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
3 buildingconstructor.com 50/100 D No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.
4 redlinebuilding.co.uk 77/100 B Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
5 akb-builders.co.uk 84/100 B No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.