Free audit data · Brighton

Website for carpenters in Brighton

We audited the top carpenters websites in Brighton and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for carpenters in Brighton, from £395, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real carpenters websites in Brighton. Average score: 74/100. Published 2026-08-16.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top carpenters websites in Brighton. Across 5 sites the average score was 74 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • olivercarpentry.co.uk — 73/100 (C). 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on Squarespace — limited design, ownership and performance.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • arcsussexcarpentry.com — 61/100 (C). The page took 3504ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • greenlanescarpentry.co.uk — 69/100 (C). Built on Wix — limited design, ownership and performance.; The site still shows © 2022 — it looks abandoned.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • brightoncarpenter.co.uk — 73/100 (C). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • bishopsofbrighton.co.uk — 92/100 (A). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.

The pattern in Brighton is consistent: most carpenters sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for carpenters in Brighton is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 carpenters sites we audited in Brighton

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 olivercarpentry.co.uk 73/100 C 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on Squarespace — limited design, ownership and performance. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
2 arcsussexcarpentry.com 61/100 C The page took 3504ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
3 greenlanescarpentry.co.uk 69/100 C Built on Wix — limited design, ownership and performance. · The site still shows © 2022 — it looks abandoned. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
4 brightoncarpenter.co.uk 73/100 C No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
5 bishopsofbrighton.co.uk 92/100 A Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.