Free audit data · Amsterdam

Website voor tandartsen in Amsterdam

We hebben de beste tandartsen-websites in Amsterdam doorgelicht en de verbeteringen geprijsd. Websites voor een vaste prijs voor tandartsen in Amsterdam, vanaf €459, klaar binnen dagen.

We audited 5 real tandartsen websites in Amsterdam. Average score: 75/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We hebben de gratis fapps.io-audit uitgevoerd op de beste tandartsen-websites in Amsterdam. Over 5 sites was de gemiddelde score 75 van de 100. De onderstaande problemen komen steeds terug, en elke oplossing heeft een vaste prijs.

  • tandarts.nl — 72/100 (C). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; 12 of 62 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; The site still shows © 2003 — it looks abandoned.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • teamtandartsen.nl — 73/100 (C). 1 of 79 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; Built on Squarespace — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • vindtandarts.nl — 92/100 (A). No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • deamsterdamsetandarts.nl — 54/100 (D). 4 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • amsterdamlokaal.nl — 84/100 (B). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.

Het patroon in Amsterdam is duidelijk: de meeste tandartsen-sites verliezen klanten door trage mobiele snelheid, onduidelijke contactgegevens en zwakke lokale SEO. Precies die punten prijzen we vooraf.

Wat het kost om te verhelpen

  • No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — gevonden op 4 van de doorgelichte sites
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites
  • 12 of 62 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites

Een volledige website voor tandartsen in Amsterdam kost vast €459, met één gratis wijzigingsronde en volledig eigendom van de broncode.

Controleer je eigen site

Dit zijn echte auditgegevens, geen sjabloon: vul je eigen webadres in bij de gratis fapps.io-auditor en krijg binnen ongeveer tien seconden je score, je problemen en je exacte prijs.

The 5 tandartsen sites we audited in Amsterdam

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 tandarts.nl 72/100 C No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · 12 of 62 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · The site still shows © 2003 — it looks abandoned.
2 teamtandartsen.nl 73/100 C 1 of 79 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · Built on Squarespace — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
3 vindtandarts.nl 92/100 A No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
4 deamsterdamsetandarts.nl 54/100 D 4 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
5 amsterdamlokaal.nl 84/100 B Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.