Free audit data · Amsterdam
Website voor dakdekkers in Amsterdam
We hebben de beste dakdekkers-websites in Amsterdam doorgelicht en de verbeteringen geprijsd. Websites voor een vaste prijs voor dakdekkers in Amsterdam, vanaf €459, klaar binnen dagen.
We hebben de gratis fapps.io-audit uitgevoerd op de beste dakdekkers-websites in Amsterdam. Over 5 sites was de gemiddelde score 61 van de 100. De onderstaande problemen komen steeds terug, en elke oplossing heeft een vaste prijs.
- dakdekkersgids.nl — 50/100 (D). The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.; 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
- dakdekkers.net — 92/100 (A). No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
- dakdekkers-nu.nl — 73/100 (C). No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
- dakdekkersinnederland.nl — 53/100 (D). The page took 2941ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
- trustoo.nl — 38/100 (D). The page has no
tag — search engines cannot tell what it is about.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.
Het patroon in Amsterdam is duidelijk: de meeste dakdekkers-sites verliezen klanten door trage mobiele snelheid, onduidelijke contactgegevens en zwakke lokale SEO. Precies die punten prijzen we vooraf.
Wat het kost om te verhelpen
- Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
- No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
- No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
- No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
- No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
Een volledige website voor dakdekkers in Amsterdam kost vast €459, met één gratis wijzigingsronde en volledig eigendom van de broncode.
Controleer je eigen site
Dit zijn echte auditgegevens, geen sjabloon: vul je eigen webadres in bij de gratis fapps.io-auditor en krijg binnen ongeveer tien seconden je score, je problemen en je exacte prijs.
The 5 dakdekkers sites we audited in Amsterdam
| Site | Score | Top issues found | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dakdekkersgids.nl | 50/100 D | The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess. · 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. |
| 2 | dakdekkers.net | 92/100 A | No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. |
| 3 | dakdekkers-nu.nl | 73/100 C | No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. |
| 4 | dakdekkersinnederland.nl | 53/100 D | The page took 2941ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. |
| 5 | trustoo.nl | 38/100 D | The page has no |
Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.