Free audit data · Amsterdam

Website voor kappers in Amsterdam

We hebben de beste kappers-websites in Amsterdam doorgelicht en de verbeteringen geprijsd. Websites voor een vaste prijs voor kappers in Amsterdam, vanaf €459, klaar binnen dagen.

We audited 5 real kappers websites in Amsterdam. Average score: 75/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We hebben de gratis fapps.io-audit uitgevoerd op de beste kappers-websites in Amsterdam. Over 5 sites was de gemiddelde score 75 van de 100. De onderstaande problemen komen steeds terug, en elke oplossing heeft een vaste prijs.

  • treatwell.nl — 73/100 (C). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • fresha.com — 92/100 (A). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.
  • allekappers.nl — 73/100 (C). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • kappers.nl — 73/100 (C). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • vogue.nl — 65/100 (C). No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.

Het patroon in Amsterdam is duidelijk: de meeste kappers-sites verliezen klanten door trage mobiele snelheid, onduidelijke contactgegevens en zwakke lokale SEO. Precies die punten prijzen we vooraf.

Wat het kost om te verhelpen

  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — gevonden op 4 van de doorgelichte sites
  • No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — gevonden op 4 van de doorgelichte sites
  • No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. — gevonden op 3 van de doorgelichte sites
  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites
  • No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites

Een volledige website voor kappers in Amsterdam kost vast €459, met één gratis wijzigingsronde en volledig eigendom van de broncode.

Controleer je eigen site

Dit zijn echte auditgegevens, geen sjabloon: vul je eigen webadres in bij de gratis fapps.io-auditor en krijg binnen ongeveer tien seconden je score, je problemen en je exacte prijs.

The 5 kappers sites we audited in Amsterdam

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 treatwell.nl 73/100 C No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
2 fresha.com 92/100 A No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.
3 allekappers.nl 73/100 C No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
4 kappers.nl 73/100 C No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
5 vogue.nl 65/100 C No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.