Free audit data · Salisbury

Website for cleaners in Salisbury

We audited the top cleaners websites in Salisbury and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for cleaners in Salisbury, from £395, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real cleaners websites in Salisbury. Average score: 76/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top cleaners websites in Salisbury. Across 5 sites the average score was 76 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • europecleaningservices.co.uk — 65/100 (C). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • maid2clean.co.uk — 92/100 (A). The site still shows © 2010 — it looks abandoned.
  • hqcleaning.co.uk — 80/100 (B). 1 of 25 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; The site still shows © 2008 — it looks abandoned.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • perfectcleaningcompany.co.uk — 73/100 (C). 3 of 35 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
  • unicorncleanservices.com — 69/100 (C). Built on Wix — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.

The pattern in Salisbury is consistent: most cleaners sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — found on 1 of the sites we audited
  • No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — found on 1 of the sites we audited
  • The site still shows © 2010 — it looks abandoned. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for cleaners in Salisbury is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 cleaners sites we audited in Salisbury

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 europecleaningservices.co.uk 65/100 C No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
2 maid2clean.co.uk 92/100 A The site still shows © 2010 — it looks abandoned.
3 hqcleaning.co.uk 80/100 B 1 of 25 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · The site still shows © 2008 — it looks abandoned. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
4 perfectcleaningcompany.co.uk 73/100 C 3 of 35 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
5 unicorncleanservices.com 69/100 C Built on Wix — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.