Free audit data · Leicester

Website for cleaners in Leicester

We audited the top cleaners websites in Leicester and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for cleaners in Leicester, from £395, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real cleaners websites in Leicester. Average score: 67/100. Published 2026-08-16.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top cleaners websites in Leicester. Across 5 sites the average score was 67 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • europecleaningservices.co.uk — 65/100 (C). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • brynemorecleaning.co.uk — 61/100 (C). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • uk.indeed.com — 31/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; 2 of 5 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.
  • trustcleanuk.com — 80/100 (B). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • zachcleaning.co.uk — 100/100 (A). No major problems found

The pattern in Leicester is consistent: most cleaners sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for cleaners in Leicester is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 cleaners sites we audited in Leicester

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 europecleaningservices.co.uk 65/100 C No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
2 brynemorecleaning.co.uk 61/100 C No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
3 uk.indeed.com 31/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.
4 trustcleanuk.com 80/100 B Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
5 zachcleaning.co.uk 100/100 A No major problems found

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.