Free audit data · Faro

Site para cabeleireiros em Faro

Analisámos os melhores sites de cabeleireiros em Faro e orçámos as correções. Sites a preço fixo para cabeleireiros em Faro, desde €459, entregues em dias.

We audited 5 real cabeleireiros websites in Faro. Average score: 64/100. Published 2026-08-17.

Passámos a auditoria gratuita da fapps.io pelos melhores sites de cabeleireiros em Faro. Em 5 sites a pontuação média foi 64 em 100. Os problemas abaixo repetem-se, e cada correção tem um preço fixo.

  • misterwhat.pt — 61/100 (C). 3 of 3 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.; The site still shows © 2011 — it looks abandoned.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • lojasehorarios.com.pt — 69/100 (C). The site still shows © 2015 — it looks abandoned.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • guiaempresas.pt — 50/100 (D). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • fresha.com — 92/100 (A). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.
  • beautynailhairsalons.com — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.

O padrão em Faro é claro: a maioria dos sites de cabeleireiros perde clientes por lentidão no telemóvel, contactos pouco claros e SEO local fraco. São exatamente as correções que orçamos à partida.

Quanto custa corrigir

  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — encontrado em 4 dos sites analisados
  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — encontrado em 3 dos sites analisados
  • The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess. — encontrado em 2 dos sites analisados
  • 3 of 3 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. — encontrado em 1 dos sites analisados
  • The site still shows © 2011 — it looks abandoned. — encontrado em 1 dos sites analisados

Um site completo para cabeleireiros em Faro custa €459 fixos, com uma ronda de alterações gratuita e propriedade total do código-fonte.

Analise o seu próprio site

São dados reais de auditoria, não um modelo: introduza o seu endereço no auditor gratuito da fapps.io e receba a pontuação, os problemas e o preço exato em cerca de dez segundos.

The 5 cabeleireiros sites we audited in Faro

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 misterwhat.pt 61/100 C 3 of 3 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess. · The site still shows © 2011 — it looks abandoned.
2 lojasehorarios.com.pt 69/100 C The site still shows © 2015 — it looks abandoned. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
3 guiaempresas.pt 50/100 D No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones. · The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.
4 fresha.com 92/100 A No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.
5 beautynailhairsalons.com 50/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.