Free audit data · Utrecht

Website voor aannemers in Utrecht

We hebben de beste aannemers-websites in Utrecht doorgelicht en de verbeteringen geprijsd. Websites voor een vaste prijs voor aannemers in Utrecht, vanaf €459, klaar binnen dagen.

We audited 5 real aannemers websites in Utrecht. Average score: 73/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We hebben de gratis fapps.io-audit uitgevoerd op de beste aannemers-websites in Utrecht. Over 5 sites was de gemiddelde score 73 van de 100. De onderstaande problemen komen steeds terug, en elke oplossing heeft een vaste prijs.

  • aannemer-nu.nl — 65/100 (C). The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.; 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • aannemerbijmij.nl — 77/100 (B). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • aannemerutrecht.com — 69/100 (C). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • halconnederland.nl — 77/100 (B). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • besteaannemer.nl — 77/100 (B). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.

Het patroon in Utrecht is duidelijk: de meeste aannemers-sites verliezen klanten door trage mobiele snelheid, onduidelijke contactgegevens en zwakke lokale SEO. Precies die punten prijzen we vooraf.

Wat het kost om te verhelpen

  • No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — gevonden op 5 van de doorgelichte sites
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — gevonden op 4 van de doorgelichte sites
  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
  • The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites
  • 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites

Een volledige website voor aannemers in Utrecht kost vast €459, met één gratis wijzigingsronde en volledig eigendom van de broncode.

Controleer je eigen site

Dit zijn echte auditgegevens, geen sjabloon: vul je eigen webadres in bij de gratis fapps.io-auditor en krijg binnen ongeveer tien seconden je score, je problemen en je exacte prijs.

The 5 aannemers sites we audited in Utrecht

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 aannemer-nu.nl 65/100 C The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess. · 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
2 aannemerbijmij.nl 77/100 B No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
3 aannemerutrecht.com 69/100 C Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
4 halconnederland.nl 77/100 B No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
5 besteaannemer.nl 77/100 B No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.