Free audit data · Leiden
Website voor aannemers in Leiden
We hebben de beste aannemers-websites in Leiden doorgelicht en de verbeteringen geprijsd. Websites voor een vaste prijs voor aannemers in Leiden, vanaf €459, klaar binnen dagen.
We hebben de gratis fapps.io-audit uitgevoerd op de beste aannemers-websites in Leiden. Over 5 sites was de gemiddelde score 73 van de 100. De onderstaande problemen komen steeds terug, en elke oplossing heeft een vaste prijs.
- aannemerleiden.com — 61/100 (C). The page took 2871ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
- besteaannemer.nl — 77/100 (B). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
- leiden-aannemer.nl — 77/100 (B). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
- voskuilbouw.nl — 72/100 (C). No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; The site still shows © 2022 — it looks abandoned.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
- bodijnaannemers.nl — 77/100 (B). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
Het patroon in Leiden is duidelijk: de meeste aannemers-sites verliezen klanten door trage mobiele snelheid, onduidelijke contactgegevens en zwakke lokale SEO. Precies die punten prijzen we vooraf.
Wat het kost om te verhelpen
- No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — gevonden op 5 van de doorgelichte sites
- No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — gevonden op 4 van de doorgelichte sites
- Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
- The page took 2871ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites
- No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites
Een volledige website voor aannemers in Leiden kost vast €459, met één gratis wijzigingsronde en volledig eigendom van de broncode.
Controleer je eigen site
Dit zijn echte auditgegevens, geen sjabloon: vul je eigen webadres in bij de gratis fapps.io-auditor en krijg binnen ongeveer tien seconden je score, je problemen en je exacte prijs.
The 5 aannemers sites we audited in Leiden
| Site | Score | Top issues found | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | aannemerleiden.com | 61/100 C | The page took 2871ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. |
| 2 | besteaannemer.nl | 77/100 B | No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. |
| 3 | leiden-aannemer.nl | 77/100 B | No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. |
| 4 | voskuilbouw.nl | 72/100 C | No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · The site still shows © 2022 — it looks abandoned. |
| 5 | bodijnaannemers.nl | 77/100 B | No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. |
Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.