Free audit data · Leiden

Website voor aannemers in Leiden

We hebben de beste aannemers-websites in Leiden doorgelicht en de verbeteringen geprijsd. Websites voor een vaste prijs voor aannemers in Leiden, vanaf €459, klaar binnen dagen.

We audited 5 real aannemers websites in Leiden. Average score: 73/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We hebben de gratis fapps.io-audit uitgevoerd op de beste aannemers-websites in Leiden. Over 5 sites was de gemiddelde score 73 van de 100. De onderstaande problemen komen steeds terug, en elke oplossing heeft een vaste prijs.

  • aannemerleiden.com — 61/100 (C). The page took 2871ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • besteaannemer.nl — 77/100 (B). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • leiden-aannemer.nl — 77/100 (B). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • voskuilbouw.nl — 72/100 (C). No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; The site still shows © 2022 — it looks abandoned.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • bodijnaannemers.nl — 77/100 (B). No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.

Het patroon in Leiden is duidelijk: de meeste aannemers-sites verliezen klanten door trage mobiele snelheid, onduidelijke contactgegevens en zwakke lokale SEO. Precies die punten prijzen we vooraf.

Wat het kost om te verhelpen

  • No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — gevonden op 5 van de doorgelichte sites
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — gevonden op 4 van de doorgelichte sites
  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
  • The page took 2871ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites
  • No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites

Een volledige website voor aannemers in Leiden kost vast €459, met één gratis wijzigingsronde en volledig eigendom van de broncode.

Controleer je eigen site

Dit zijn echte auditgegevens, geen sjabloon: vul je eigen webadres in bij de gratis fapps.io-auditor en krijg binnen ongeveer tien seconden je score, je problemen en je exacte prijs.

The 5 aannemers sites we audited in Leiden

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 aannemerleiden.com 61/100 C The page took 2871ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
2 besteaannemer.nl 77/100 B No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
3 leiden-aannemer.nl 77/100 B No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
4 voskuilbouw.nl 72/100 C No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · The site still shows © 2022 — it looks abandoned.
5 bodijnaannemers.nl 77/100 B No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.