Free audit data · Hull

Website for roofers in Hull

We audited the top roofers websites in Hull and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for roofers in Hull, from £395, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real roofers websites in Hull. Average score: 72/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top roofers websites in Hull. Across 5 sites the average score was 72 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • roofershull.co.uk — 81/100 (B). 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • rooferhull.co.uk — 66/100 (C). The site is not served over HTTPS — visitors see an insecure warning.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • hullroofers.co.uk — 65/100 (C). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; 3 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
  • uktradefinder.com — 73/100 (C). No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • kingstonroofline.co.uk — 77/100 (B). 1 of 12 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.

The pattern in Hull is consistent: most roofers sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. — found on 4 of the sites we audited
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. — found on 1 of the sites we audited
  • The site is not served over HTTPS — visitors see an insecure warning. — found on 1 of the sites we audited
  • No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for roofers in Hull is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 roofers sites we audited in Hull

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 roofershull.co.uk 81/100 B 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
2 rooferhull.co.uk 66/100 C The site is not served over HTTPS — visitors see an insecure warning. · No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
3 hullroofers.co.uk 65/100 C No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · 3 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
4 uktradefinder.com 73/100 C No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
5 kingstonroofline.co.uk 77/100 B 1 of 12 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.