Free audit data · Stoke-on-Trent

Website for restaurants in Stoke-on-Trent

We audited the top restaurants websites in Stoke-on-Trent and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for restaurants in Stoke-on-Trent, from £395, delivered in days.

We audited 4 real restaurants websites in Stoke-on-Trent. Average score: 56/100. Published 2026-08-16.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top restaurants websites in Stoke-on-Trent. Across 4 sites the average score was 56 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • exploretheheartofengland.co.uk — 80/100 (B). The page took 2890ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
  • thefork.co.uk — 35/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.
  • restaurantji.co.uk — 58/100 (C). 2 of 48 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • unilocal.net — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.

The pattern in Stoke-on-Trent is consistent: most restaurants sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • The page took 2890ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for restaurants in Stoke-on-Trent is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 4 restaurants sites we audited in Stoke-on-Trent

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 exploretheheartofengland.co.uk 80/100 B The page took 2890ms to load — slow pages lose visitors and rank lower. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
2 thefork.co.uk 35/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.
3 restaurantji.co.uk 58/100 C 2 of 48 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
4 unilocal.net 50/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.