Free audit data · Manchester

Website for removals companies in Manchester

We audited the top removals companies websites in Manchester and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for removals companies in Manchester, from £395, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real removals companies websites in Manchester. Average score: 72/100. Published 2026-08-16.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top removals companies websites in Manchester. Across 5 sites the average score was 72 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • manchesterremovalsgb.co.uk — 69/100 (C). 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; The site still shows © 2023 — it looks abandoned.
  • daddyremovals.co.uk — 84/100 (B). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; The site still shows © 2022 — it looks abandoned.
  • removalscompanymanchester.co.uk — 69/100 (C). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; The site still shows © 2023 — it looks abandoned.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • mcrremovals.co.uk — 88/100 (B). 1 of 17 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
  • jtkremovalsmanchester.co.uk — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.

The pattern in Manchester is consistent: most removals companies sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 4 of the sites we audited
  • The site still shows © 2023 — it looks abandoned. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. — found on 1 of the sites we audited
  • The site still shows © 2022 — it looks abandoned. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for removals companies in Manchester is a fixed £395, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 removals companies sites we audited in Manchester

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 manchesterremovalsgb.co.uk 69/100 C 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · The site still shows © 2023 — it looks abandoned.
2 daddyremovals.co.uk 84/100 B Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · The site still shows © 2022 — it looks abandoned.
3 removalscompanymanchester.co.uk 69/100 C Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · The site still shows © 2023 — it looks abandoned. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
4 mcrremovals.co.uk 88/100 B 1 of 17 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
5 jtkremovalsmanchester.co.uk 50/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.