Free audit data · Indianapolis

Website for real estate agents in Indianapolis

We audited the top real estate agents websites in Indianapolis and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for real estate agents in Indianapolis, from $499, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real real estate agents websites in Indianapolis. Average score: 51/100. Published 2026-08-16.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top real estate agents websites in Indianapolis. Across 5 sites the average score was 51 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • realtor.com — 35/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 429 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.
  • zillow.com — 69/100 (C). 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; The site still shows © 2006 — it looks abandoned.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • callcarpenter.com — 31/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.
  • redfin.com — 85/100 (B). 4 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.
  • homes.com — 35/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.

The pattern in Indianapolis is consistent: most real estate agents sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • The site returned HTTP 429 — it may be down or blocking auditors. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for real estate agents in Indianapolis is a fixed $499, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 real estate agents sites we audited in Indianapolis

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 realtor.com 35/100 D The site returned HTTP 429 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.
2 zillow.com 69/100 C 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO. · The site still shows © 2006 — it looks abandoned. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
3 callcarpenter.com 31/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.
4 redfin.com 85/100 B 4 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.
5 homes.com 35/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.