Free audit data · Detroit
Website for moving companies in Detroit
We audited the top moving companies websites in Detroit and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for moving companies in Detroit, from $499, delivered in days.
We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top moving companies websites in Detroit. Across 5 sites the average score was 77 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.
- imoving.com — 84/100 (B). 1 of 23 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
- moving-companies-detroit.moversprocess.com — 54/100 (D). No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
- corriganmoving.com — 88/100 (B). 1 of 27 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
- moverdash.com — 80/100 (B). The site still shows © 2004 — it looks abandoned.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.; No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag.
- moving.com — 80/100 (B). 1 of 22 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; The site still shows © 1999 — it looks abandoned.
The pattern in Detroit is consistent: most moving companies sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.
What it costs to fix
- No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
- No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
- Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
- 1 of 23 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. — found on 1 of the sites we audited
- No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones. — found on 1 of the sites we audited
A full website build for moving companies in Detroit is a fixed $499, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.
Check your own site
This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.
The 5 moving companies sites we audited in Detroit
| Site | Score | Top issues found | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | imoving.com | 84/100 B | 1 of 23 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. |
| 2 | moving-companies-detroit.moversprocess.com | 54/100 D | No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess. |
| 3 | corriganmoving.com | 88/100 B | 1 of 27 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. |
| 4 | moverdash.com | 80/100 B | The site still shows © 2004 — it looks abandoned. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. · No online booking found — enquiries may be lost to phone tag. |
| 5 | moving.com | 80/100 B | 1 of 22 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · The site still shows © 1999 — it looks abandoned. |
Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.