Free audit data · Raleigh

Website for law firms in Raleigh

We audited the top law firms websites in Raleigh and priced the fixes. Fixed-price website builds for law firms in Raleigh, from $499, delivered in days.

We audited 5 real law firms websites in Raleigh. Average score: 69/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We ran the free fapps.io audit across the top law firms websites in Raleigh. Across 5 sites the average score was 69 out of 100. The issues below are the ones that keep showing up, and every fix has a fixed price.

  • goodfirms.co — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • lawfuel.com — 72/100 (C). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
  • bestlawfirms.com — 73/100 (C). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.
  • raleighreport.org — 100/100 (A). No major problems found
  • bizjournals.com — 50/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.

The pattern in Raleigh is consistent: most law firms sites lose customers on mobile speed, unclear contact details and weak local SEO. Those are exactly the fixes we price up front.

What it costs to fix

  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — found on 4 of the sites we audited
  • No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — found on 3 of the sites we audited
  • The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — found on 2 of the sites we audited
  • Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — found on 1 of the sites we audited

A full website build for law firms in Raleigh is a fixed $499, with one free round of changes and full source-code ownership.

Check your own site

This is live audit data, not a template: paste your own website address into the free fapps.io auditor and get your score, your issues and your exact price in about ten seconds.

The 5 law firms sites we audited in Raleigh

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 goodfirms.co 50/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.
2 lawfuel.com 72/100 C No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
3 bestlawfirms.com 73/100 C No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones. · The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.
4 raleighreport.org 100/100 A No major problems found
5 bizjournals.com 50/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.