Free audit data · Amersfoort
Website voor timmermannen in Amersfoort
We hebben de beste timmermannen-websites in Amersfoort doorgelicht en de verbeteringen geprijsd. Websites voor een vaste prijs voor timmermannen in Amersfoort, vanaf €459, klaar binnen dagen.
We hebben de gratis fapps.io-audit uitgevoerd op de beste timmermannen-websites in Amersfoort. Over 4 sites was de gemiddelde score 54 van de 100. De onderstaande problemen komen steeds terug, en elke oplossing heeft een vaste prijs.
- houtindustrie-amersfoort.nl — 69/100 (C). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
- amer-hout.nl — 69/100 (C). Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.; No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you.
- woordesbouw.nl — 57/100 (C). No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; 17 of 22 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
- timmerbedrijf-frank.nl — 20/100 (D). The site is not served over HTTPS — visitors see an insecure warning.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; 7 of 8 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.
Het patroon in Amersfoort is duidelijk: de meeste timmermannen-sites verliezen klanten door trage mobiele snelheid, onduidelijke contactgegevens en zwakke lokale SEO. Precies die punten prijzen we vooraf.
Wat het kost om te verhelpen
- Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. — gevonden op 3 van de doorgelichte sites
- No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
- No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
- No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
- 17 of 22 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites
Een volledige website voor timmermannen in Amersfoort kost vast €459, met één gratis wijzigingsronde en volledig eigendom van de broncode.
Controleer je eigen site
Dit zijn echte auditgegevens, geen sjabloon: vul je eigen webadres in bij de gratis fapps.io-auditor en krijg binnen ongeveer tien seconden je score, je problemen en je exacte prijs.
The 4 timmermannen sites we audited in Amersfoort
| Site | Score | Top issues found | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | houtindustrie-amersfoort.nl | 69/100 C | Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. |
| 2 | amer-hout.nl | 69/100 C | Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance. · No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. · No clear contact details found — interested customers cannot reach you. |
| 3 | woordesbouw.nl | 57/100 C | No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · 17 of 22 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess. |
| 4 | timmerbedrijf-frank.nl | 20/100 D | The site is not served over HTTPS — visitors see an insecure warning. · No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. |
Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.