Free audit data · Apeldoorn

Website voor schilders in Apeldoorn

We hebben de beste schilders-websites in Apeldoorn doorgelicht en de verbeteringen geprijsd. Websites voor een vaste prijs voor schilders in Apeldoorn, vanaf €459, klaar binnen dagen.

We audited 4 real schilders websites in Apeldoorn. Average score: 43/100. Published 2026-08-17.

We hebben de gratis fapps.io-audit uitgevoerd op de beste schilders-websites in Apeldoorn. Over 4 sites was de gemiddelde score 43 van de 100. De onderstaande problemen komen steeds terug, en elke oplossing heeft een vaste prijs.

  • p-c-a.nl — 50/100 (D). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.; No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them.
  • jonker-schilders.nl — 35/100 (D). The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors.; No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.; The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.
  • kleverwal.nl — 50/100 (D). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; 1 of 3 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.; Built on WordPress — limited design, ownership and performance.
  • stevenjansen.nl — 38/100 (D). No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet.; No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines.; 8 of 24 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.; 2 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.

Het patroon in Apeldoorn is duidelijk: de meeste schilders-sites verliezen klanten door trage mobiele snelheid, onduidelijke contactgegevens en zwakke lokale SEO. Precies die punten prijzen we vooraf.

Wat het kost om te verhelpen

  • No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. — gevonden op 4 van de doorgelichte sites
  • No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
  • The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess. — gevonden op 2 van de doorgelichte sites
  • No privacy policy or terms found — visitors and regulators expect them. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites
  • The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. — gevonden op 1 van de doorgelichte sites

Een volledige website voor schilders in Apeldoorn kost vast €459, met één gratis wijzigingsronde en volledig eigendom van de broncode.

Controleer je eigen site

Dit zijn echte auditgegevens, geen sjabloon: vul je eigen webadres in bij de gratis fapps.io-auditor en krijg binnen ongeveer tien seconden je score, je problemen en je exacte prijs.

The 4 schilders sites we audited in Apeldoorn

SiteScoreTop issues found
1 p-c-a.nl 50/100 D No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones. · The page does not declare a language — screen readers and translations guess.
2 jonker-schilders.nl 35/100 D The site returned HTTP 403 — it may be down or blocking auditors. · No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No mobile viewport tag — the site does not adapt to phones.
3 kleverwal.nl 50/100 D No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · 1 of 3 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer. · 1 of 4 checked internal links are broken — dead pages cost trust and SEO.
4 stevenjansen.nl 38/100 D No meta description — links to the site show an empty snippet. · No H1 heading — the page lacks a clear headline for visitors and search engines. · 8 of 24 images have no alt text — accessibility and image search suffer.

Audits run through the same engine as the free fapps.io website auditor. Scores change over time and no judgement is implied about the businesses themselves — the point is what their websites get wrong.